Participant quick reference

Gradebook by Design

A compact guide for thinking through Gradebook structure, calculation, visibility, status, workflow, and the learner-facing experience.

Review before you change. When a setting could alter current grades, category weights, or what students can see, verify what it does and whether it fits the grading plan for the course.

Structure

Pause

If a student compared the grading information for your course with the Canvas Grades page, would both communicate the same grading structure?

Calculation

Pause

Would a percentage near a letter-grade boundary produce the same result everywhere a student might look?

Visibility

Pause

When you enter a score or comment, when does the student actually see it — and is that when you intended?

Status

Pause

If an automated late or missing policy were applied today, what would change — and what would students see?

Workflow

Open → Review → Score → Feedback → Status → Verify → Next

Use the sequence as a workflow check, not a rule. The goal is to reduce avoidable second passes while keeping score, feedback, status, and visibility intentional.

Pause

Which part of your current grading process is most likely to create an avoidable second pass?

Learner view

Pause

If a student opened Grades right now, what would be immediately clear — and what might still require explanation?

A simple decision lens

Examine → Predict → Verify → Decide

Look at the situation, anticipate the likely effect, check what Canvas actually does, and then decide what fits the course.

About this guide: These are questions and practices to consider, not institutional policy. Published college, program, department, and course requirements remain the governing source when they apply.