Use the Gradebook intentionally.

The Gradebook is more than a calculator. Its structure, settings, statuses, and visibility choices all shape what instructors and learners understand about progress in a course.

Start with the learner experience.Consider what the learner sees, understands, and can act on.
Make intentional choices.Examine → Predict → Verify → Decide.
Practice with something real.Use your own syllabus and course whenever possible.
Leave with a next move.Identify one thing to verify, revise, test, or investigate.
Review before you change. A setting can affect calculation, visibility, or student interpretation. Verify what it does and whether it fits your course before making a live change.

Would these two grading systems necessarily communicate the same thing?

Start with the grading plan communicated to students, then compare it with what Canvas is actually calculating.

Syllabus says

Exams 40% · Projects 30% · Weekly Work 20% · Participation 10%

Canvas shows

All assignments are calculated from raw points with no weighted Assignment Groups.

ExaminePredictVerifyDecide
What would you want to know before deciding there is a problem?
  • How many points are in each category?
  • Are Assignment Groups being used?
  • Is weighting enabled?
  • Does the Canvas total reflect the grading approach communicated to students?
PauseTap or click to reflect

If a student compared the grading information for your course with the Canvas Grades page, would both communicate the same grading structure?

Canvas calculates the grading structure that is configured.

Work through the Gradebook decisions that matter most

Questions for consideration: these prompts are intended to help instructors understand what Canvas can do, what a setting changes, and what may be worth checking in a particular course. They are not institutional policy.

1

Structure: Assignment Groups + weights

Compare the grading method communicated to students with the current Assignment Group structure. When weighted grading is used, group percentages and assignment placement work together.

Scenario: The Midterm Project is sitting in Weekly Work instead of Projects. Before moving it, what could change?

Verify: Locate one graded item and confirm which group controls its contribution to the course total.

PauseDiscuss or jot a response

Could changing an Assignment Group alter current student totals? What would you verify first?

2

Calculation: what is Canvas calculating?

Points, weighted groups, and grading schemes answer different questions. A grading scheme, when used, affects how a percentage is represented as a letter grade; it does not create the underlying course total.

Scenario: A student has 89.5%. Would that percentage necessarily be represented the same way everywhere the student looks?

Verify: If a Canvas grading scheme is active, compare one boundary percentage with the scale communicated for the course.

PauseThink before checking

Would a percentage near a letter-grade boundary produce the same result everywhere a student might look?

3

Visibility: graded does not always mean visible

Canvas supports automatic and manual grade posting. The active setting affects when students can see scores and feedback.

Mystery: “I graded the assignment and entered comments, but my student says they cannot see either one.” What would you investigate?

Verify: Open one recently graded assignment and identify its current posting state.

PauseDiscuss

When you enter a score or comment, when does the student actually see it — and is that when you intended?

4

Status: what happened here?

A score and a status are related, but they are not the same thing. Use the explorer below to compare common Gradebook states.

Choose a Gradebook state.Select a button to compare what the state communicates.
Try the cases:
  1. No submission was received by the due date.
  2. The student submitted two days late.
  3. The student was excused from the assignment.
  4. The student completed the work and earned zero points.
  5. No score is visible yet because grading is not complete.

Which combination of score, status, and visibility would accurately describe each situation in your course?

PauseCheck your own course

If an automated late or missing policy were applied today, what would change — and what would students see?

5

Workflow: reduce the second pass

Use the sequence as a workflow check rather than a rule: Open → Review → Score → Feedback → Status → Verify → Next.

PauseIdentify your bottleneck

Which part of your current grading process is most likely to create an avoidable second pass?

Audit one real course

Use your syllabus and Canvas course together. The goal is not to change everything today; it is to know what is intentional, what needs another look, and what needs more information.

StructureDoes Canvas represent the grading structure I intend?
CalculationDo I understand how this total is being calculated?
VisibilityAre grades and feedback becoming visible when I intend?
StatusDo the score and status accurately communicate what happened?
WorkflowWhere am I creating unnecessary grading rework?
Learner viewWhat does this look like from the student side?
0 of 6 reviewed
PauseFinal reflection

If a student opened Grades right now, what would be immediately clear — and what might still require explanation?

Saved only in this browser on this device.